Home About Services
Infrastructure Health Audit™ Utility Governance Audit™ Stormwater & Flood Resiliency Audit™ Infrastructure Risk Assurance Program™ Forensic Infrastructure Investigation™ Capital Prioritization & Risk Analysis™ Compliance & Operational Controls Review™
Who We Serve Case Studies Resources Speaking & Training Request Consultation
Services

Seven Service Lines. One Operating Discipline.

Every MIACS engagement — whether a single audit or an annual program — is built on the same structured methodology: independent data collection, condition assessment, risk stratification, and executive-ready reporting.

That methodology is packaged as the MIACS Infrastructure Intelligence Framework™, and every engagement below produces findings within the MIACS Executive Dashboard™ report.

📄

Infrastructure Health Audit™

Comprehensive asset condition and risk evaluation across water, wastewater, stormwater, and public works systems — establishing what condition your infrastructure is actually in.

P×C Scoring Useful-Life Analysis
  • Asset inventory consolidation and normalization
  • Condition, useful-life, and failure-probability analysis
  • Consequence-of-failure scoring by asset
  • Risk-ranked findings report for executive review
🗂️

Utility Governance Audit™

Review of compliance programs, SOPs, documentation, and operational controls — the institutional layer meant to catch problems before they become failures.

SOP Review Institutional Controls
  • SOP and documentation review
  • Operational control mapping
  • Institutional knowledge and succession-risk review
  • Governance gap report with corrective priorities
🌧️

Stormwater & Flood Resiliency Audit™

Evaluation of drainage systems, flood vulnerabilities, and resilience programs — both a public-safety issue and a compliance issue for Florida municipalities.

Flood Risk Drainage Capacity
  • Drainage system condition and capacity review
  • Flood vulnerability mapping by asset and area
  • Resilience program effectiveness assessment
  • Risk-prioritized resilience recommendations
🔄

Infrastructure Risk Assurance Program™

Annual oversight and recurring audit services that keep risk data current between major capital cycles — risk data goes stale; this keeps it live.

Annualized Recurring Oversight
  • Annual re-assessment and re-scoring of prior findings
  • Tracking of corrective-action implementation
  • Recurring executive briefing to leadership and Boards
  • Governance framework resilient to staff turnover
🔍

Forensic Infrastructure Investigation™

Root-cause analysis for failures, recurring issues, and service disruptions — independent answers beyond "it was old," suitable for regulatory review.

Root-Cause Analysis Litigation-Ready
  • Independent root-cause analysis
  • Review of maintenance history and operational records
  • Identification of systemic vs. isolated causes
  • Audit- and litigation-ready findings report
📈

Capital Prioritization & Risk Analysis™

Risk-based capital planning and project prioritization — a defensible, risk-ranked sequence for which projects should move first.

Capital Planning Replace-vs-Monitor
  • Risk-based ranking of capital project candidates
  • Replace-vs-monitor decision framework
  • Funding and grant-justification-ready documentation
  • Multi-year capital sequencing recommendation

Compliance & Operational Controls Review™

Governance, documentation, and operational compliance assessments — designed to surface gaps before a regulator or auditor does.

Regulatory Compliance Documentation Review
  • Regulatory compliance gap assessment
  • Documentation and recordkeeping review
  • Operational controls evaluation
  • Prioritized corrective-action roadmap

Know Your Risk Before the Budget Vote Does

Capital Prioritization & Risk Analysis™ applies the MIACS risk-stratification model to an existing project list or capital improvement plan, producing a defensible, risk-ranked sequence — including explicit replace-vs-monitor frameworks for borderline assets.

Florida municipalities face finite capital budgets and unevenly distributed risk. Your sequencing should reflect that reality, not a generic age-based replacement list.

Request a Capital Prioritization Review
1
Ingest the Project ListExisting capital improvement plan or project candidates consolidated into one dataset.
2
Score Each CandidateApply Probability × Consequence scoring consistently across every project.
3
Apply Decision RulesReplace-vs-monitor frameworks resolve borderline cases with a stated criterion.
4
Sequence the PlanDeliver a multi-year, risk-ranked capital sequence ready for the budget cycle.

Not Sure Which Service Fits Your Situation?

Talk to MIACS